***** ALERT - Nominations for your new ClubCJ Committee can be made here *****

2.0L or 2.4L???

Everything Lancer Related + News & Current Affairs.

Moderators: Moderators, Senior Moderators

User avatar
tryg
Lancer MASTER
Lancer MASTER
Posts: 2135
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:21 pm
Location: Toowoomba, QLD, Australia

Postby tryg » Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:08 pm

gee, that would be like <60 for you Sir-VRX !

SIR-VRX
Genius
Genius
Posts: 7244
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 11:16 pm
Location: Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Postby SIR-VRX » Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:27 pm

tryg, <3 = heart

I have driven both 2.0 and 2.4 back to back substantially, and there is a noticeable difference between the 2 performance wise, however, the 2.0 is still fast enough up the top end to keep up with a 2.4 :P

User avatar
squala
Post Monster
Post Monster
Posts: 2869
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 12:23 am
Location: Fines City, VIC, Australia

Postby squala » Tue Oct 20, 2009 12:41 am

RX is pretty much the best deal (after Platinum). Alloys and complete airbags and your ride is already made-up.
///// /////
7 airbags
6-speed SST
5-star safety
4-wheel drive
3-diamond badge
2 overhead cams
1 awesome ride
0 demerit points and gutter rash


Image

User avatar
Bandit
Lancer Legend
Lancer Legend
Posts: 1170
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 8:56 am
Location: The People's Republic of Campbelltown

Postby Bandit » Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:43 am

I got the VRX as it looked the goods and I couldn't be bothered going through the hassle of aftermarket alloys (lame I know, but true - like I tell the wife - can't get in trouble for telling the truth).

I also think it will have a bit better resale in years to come as they are rarer on the road than other models. The 2.4 was just a bonus. I didn't realise they were putting the bigger engine in the MY09 until I went to the dealer for a test drive....
ClubCJ's first Sportback


Return to “ClubCJ Talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 70 guests