***** ALERT - Nominations for your new ClubCJ Committee can be made here *****

PP vs PU

Exterior Parts/Accessories & Modifications.

Moderators: Moderators, Senior Moderators

User avatar
Metalstrix
Post Monster
Post Monster
Posts: 2739
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:16 pm
Location: Sydney Australia

PP vs PU

Postby Metalstrix » Thu Aug 29, 2013 8:11 pm

Hey guys

I thought I would start a discussion about whether to use PP (polypropylene) or
PU (polyurethane) material as an exterior mod.

I have searched the forum and there isn't anything on it.
Infact when creating this post, searching PP vs PU results in this:
Image

I don't know why...

Anyways, I've always asked myself should I use PP or PU for my body kit?
It's such a big question because body kit retailers are selling kits in either PP or PU.
For those who are curious like myself, here's an insight of PP and PU.

I found that people from other forums were getting confused with themselves.
But the below information is what I've collected from them.
After using a bit of logic, both characteristics of PP and PU
have been properly allocated to their right name.

Again please correct me if I'm wrong.


Polypropylene (PP) - Is like plastic. It can crack and scratch and unfortunately won't bend.
We had a member in Mount Gambier who had ABS plastic (similar to PP) and reversed into a pole
and had a massive sharp hole/crack in his rear bumper. But PP is good for side skirts and Spoilers
But not as bumpers.

Polyurethane (PU) - Has high tensile strength, Impact resistant, high compressive strength,
and resists stress cracking while retaining stiffness and flex.
So basically this means, if you run into something, it can bend, but obviously, if bent too much, it'll crack.

Ideally it's better to get PU. But if you're confident about not getting into accidents, PP should be okay.
But both are definitely legal.

According to the clubcj, Fibreglass is illegal on the road. DO NOT get the below terminologies you see
over the internet:

Carbon Fibreglass
Fibreglass
FRP
FB
Dry Carbon
etc. Apparently, it can be quite dangerous and sharp in accidents where as PP and PU can take a bend effect.

If you guys have anything to add to this, start posting!
Last edited by Metalstrix on Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
They will learn... I will always be a step ahead

No longer an active member.

User avatar
yuj1n
Lancer ES/EX
Lancer ES/EX
Posts: 110
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 4:14 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby yuj1n » Thu Aug 29, 2013 8:26 pm

PP would be better for most applications such as a bumper or a front bar, in case you hit a pole/block at the end of the parking space it won't crack as easily from a bump. However its more expensive. PP is also easier to modify to make the body kit fit better.

Maybe for smaller stuff like a front lip the difference won't be as noticeable. What are you looking at getting?

User avatar
pana161
Lancer ES/EX
Lancer ES/EX
Posts: 103
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 8:32 pm

Postby pana161 » Fri Aug 30, 2013 7:45 am

If your thinking of making a part & buying the material from a plastic wholesaler or distributor, beware as the PP sheeting won't be UV stabilised.

Not too sure about nowadays, but back in the early 2000's Holden & Ford were making all their front & rear bumper covers in PU not PP as the PU is less brittle and you can add a UV inhibitor to the material before casting the bar.

User avatar
Metalstrix
Post Monster
Post Monster
Posts: 2739
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:16 pm
Location: Sydney Australia

Postby Metalstrix » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:17 am

I've re-edited the info above
They will learn... I will always be a step ahead

No longer an active member.


Return to “Exterior”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests