***** ALERT - Nominations for your new ClubCJ Committee can be made here *****
Weapon R: Secret Weapon Dual Tube Air Intake Review
Moderators: Moderators, Senior Moderators
Hoges wrote:Hmmmm Ive scene these on ebay. Wasn't game enough to purchase it. That fuel consumption on the Highway seems EXTREMELY high. With my 2.0L ive only got a HKS panel filter, my FC drops to 6.9L at a cruise control speed of about 110-115km/h. What your saying seems very very odd
I think you confused the figures... drake89 quoted km/L and it sounds like you quoted L/100km.
- shamrockshirts
- Lancer Ralliart
- Posts: 584
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 2:20 pm
- Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Contact:
Any mods to the intake system on the lancer should really be custom tuned afterwards as our Air Flow Meters are very sensitive to change.
I know you may think its doing no harm (or how can it) but your Air Fuel Ratios could be drastically changed from this mod. Long term serious engine damage could be a reality. I'm not saying don't buy it, just try to be aware of the potential long term results.
cheers
John
I know you may think its doing no harm (or how can it) but your Air Fuel Ratios could be drastically changed from this mod. Long term serious engine damage could be a reality. I'm not saying don't buy it, just try to be aware of the potential long term results.
cheers
John
Re: Weapon R: Secret Weapon Dual Tube Air Intake Review
here is all figures converted to L/100km
9.52 L/100km OLDMAN
13.69 L/100km 18Y/O
11.48 L/100km HIGHWAY
8.54 L/100km HIGHWAY
from that you can see it completly ruins your fuel consuption.
I have a CAI and i have never gone over 9L/100km driving spirited. not on a highway, and on a highway i get under 7.
IMHO not worth the extra usage in fuel.
9.52 L/100km OLDMAN
13.69 L/100km 18Y/O
11.48 L/100km HIGHWAY
8.54 L/100km HIGHWAY
from that you can see it completly ruins your fuel consuption.
I have a CAI and i have never gone over 9L/100km driving spirited. not on a highway, and on a highway i get under 7.
IMHO not worth the extra usage in fuel.
IF YOUR NOT LIVING ON THE EDGE YOUR TAKING UP TOO MUCH ROOM
Re: Weapon R: Secret Weapon Dual Tube Air Intake Review
Blakey wrote:here is all figures converted to L/100km
9.52 L/100km OLDMAN
13.69 L/100km 18Y/O
11.48 L/100km HIGHWAY
8.54 L/100km HIGHWAY
from that you can see it completly ruins your fuel consuption.
I have a CAI and i have never gone over 9L/100km driving spirited. not on a highway, and on a highway i get under 7.
IMHO not worth the extra usage in fuel.
Wow those figures are comparable to my X!!
"A man who stands for nothing, falls for anything."
- aussie027
- Lancer Ralliart
- Posts: 554
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 4:02 am
- Location: Perth, WA, Australia
Guys, as a matter of fact fuel consumption figures in km/L are far more useful than L/100km which are a practically useless figure.
You want to know how far you can go on your remaining fuel and it is far easier to calculate in your head while driving for a pretty accurate figure using KM/L knowing lets say how much fuel you have left and how far you have to go.
You want to know how far you can go on your remaining fuel and it is far easier to calculate in your head while driving for a pretty accurate figure using KM/L knowing lets say how much fuel you have left and how far you have to go.
I FIND YOUR LACK OF FAITH DISTURBING......
aussie027 wrote:Guys, as a matter of fact fuel consumption figures in km/L are far more useful than L/100km which are a practically useless figure.
You want to know how far you can go on your remaining fuel and it is far easier to calculate in your head while driving for a pretty accurate figure using KM/L knowing lets say how much fuel you have left and how far you have to go.
What if you know how far you are going but you need to know how much fuel you need?
I dont think it matters which one you use.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests