Aaron2550 wrote:Take all the pros & cons into consideration, but in the end go with your heart.
I would love to go with my heart but I'm really afraid of forging out huge some of money for repairing shits where I could have use that money to mod the lancer or to get some other stuffs that I want to
bd-850 wrote:from reading, you want a mx5 but worried your gonna get yourself in trouble with the RWD, so you thought Civic Type R, have a look at the EP3 Type R, its quicker than FN2 R, and much better looking IMO
If I get to choose, I would get the Type R over the mx5. Just that previously I never get to find any type r that is within my budget so yea.
I considered EP3 before and I have to agree is a much better car than the FN2 R. However since I'm going to drive it as a daily car hence I would want a more decent interior, I'm weird I know
lol
Chubb wrote:[quote:a79a2abc94]S2000! Is great car IMO, but is difficult to find one in good condition. And is probably a huge learning curve for me to conquer a FR car. [/quote:a79a2abc94] Learning curve? a FR car is not a weapon of death that will kill you on the first corner, if any thing a FR car is alot easier to control on the edge of grip then a FF car. If you were however going to a super charged or turbo charged ute like Iam considering you may have some scary moments
[quote:a79a2abc94]whats your neighbor hood like? (convertibles are very easy to break into)[/quote:a79a2abc94] All cars are easy to break into when using a criminal master key (commonly known as a brick, or the light weight version the half brick
). A convertible top requires something sharp to cut it, while a window only requires a quick kick from a boot. Solution insurance plus alarm. [quote:a79a2abc94] Hmmm do you think it will be a good idea to forge out a hundred to two hundred to get an independent inspection on the car?[/quote:a79a2abc94] Hmmm YES YES YES!!!! would you rather spend $20,000 on a lemon or $200 on a check??? NEVER buy a second hand without getting it checked, also check to see if it has been on the repairable write off registry as well. My Final word: No an over grown RWD go kart will not kill you in the first bend. Now this is just my opinion so take it with a grain of salt and tell me to piss off but I have always seen the MX5 as a hair dressers car when they are stock, but they can look really nice with a subtle body kit and exhaust so get your mod on
.
Haha yea is not a weapon of death, but I have been into a 350Z and it was quite difficult to master it in a track. But it is a lot nicer to drive if is within the limit/grip.
Nah, you could break in with a fist wrapped in clothe!
Much easier IMO hah!
Guess if I do plan to get either the mx-5 or the fn2r, I will bring it to an independent check. Anyone know a good one in Brisbane? And I assume the check would list out what needs to be replace and what not?
Haha I actually have to agree with you on that, but not on the first gen of MX-5. It has great potential as a project for track car
SXLancerMum wrote:Mazdas are brilliant little cars that are mostly extremely reliable. 85000 kms isnt really that much on them. Mine has 180,000 and is nearly 15 and its still purring along nicely. It was 11 when it got new brakes and a new clutch and I drive it hard. Its a 121 but they are all the same in the reliability department. The old 929 Coupe was 21 when I got the engine rebuilt. Im sure youll find that the MX5 is no different. Youre young and the MX5 is fun. Go for it now before you get married and the wife insists that you sell it for a family SUV (mind you Im not that sort of wife and Id insist on keeping the MX5 and getting something bigger as well). My 20 year olds first car at 17 was a 1979 Series 1 RX7 that I went halves with him in. Most fun you can have with your pants on. My young fun cars were a 1970 Mini K 1100 and then a 1973 Mazda 929 Coupe (pointy nose RX4 shape) and boy did I have a great time with them. My retirement car was going to be an RX8
Got to have some fun sometime
On the breaking in issue......you can get hard top MX5s. I actually prefer those myself.
Haha yea!! I hope my future wife would understand and let me have a not-so-practical car
From what I know, it does seems like a pretty cheap car to run since it has change to timing chain so there's no need for replacement of the timing belt etc other than spark plug at the 100k service or so.
But things that worry me is that, the MX-5 that I have my eye on does not come with the Dynamic Stability Control and Traction control.
The series 1 RX7 is a great car IMO, one of the car that I would get as a collector, along with the Corolla AE86
I do prefer the hard top but budget is an issue so yea
I think I might give the FN2R a good look and see how it goes. I know the 110k service is just a checkup but the 120k seems like a bomb(600-900$) according to carservice.com.au! Might give honda a call.
By the way, anyone of you guys used
Touch Up Guys before? If I'm selling the lancer I would need to fix 2 trolley dents made by some ignorant people + paint chips and a small scratch/dent cause by someone reverse his tow bar into my rear end without leaving a note!