***** ALERT - Nominations for your new ClubCJ Committee can be made here *****

Fuel economy when you drive in the city/short distances...

Evo X Performance & Modifications.

Moderators: Moderators, Senior Moderators

User avatar
tadz0rz
Genius
Genius
Posts: 6955
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:54 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Contact:

Postby tadz0rz » Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:41 pm

Yeah, i agree, No need to merge, 4B11 and 4B11T will provide differnt numbers and will conflict with the other standard 4B11 numbers.
Got a question? Read the ClubCJ Ultimate Guide First!!
Image
Just...Dont worry about it ;)Dont Click Me

User avatar
JaCe
Alumni
Alumni
Posts: 1819
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 7:17 am
Location: Sydney, AU

Postby JaCe » Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:58 pm

Thanks. Just got back from sitting in Sydney CBD traffic (bumper to bumper) with buses merging everywhere along Oxford St, Pitt St, Market St, etc... 25L/100km. Not a good sign.
Image

"A man who stands for nothing, falls for anything."

User avatar
Dejan
INACTIVE Member Account
Posts: 330
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:23 am
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia

Postby Dejan » Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:22 am

yeah 25Litre driving in the city im' not surprised at tll especially stuck in traffic and given u live in the city makes perfect sense.

U gotta cruise quite a bit to drive the fuel economy down as we all know they start with 90L/100K or something and gradually decline from there as soon as ur car starts moving, but if ur stuck in traffic with buses merging in and out ur constantly on 2nd and 3rd gear at best, can be very consuming.

I recorded some pretty shocking economy as well, and if u get frustrated and floor ur car while a gap's available, then you will soon step into the Veyron territory before you realise.

Dejan
What goes around comes around.

User avatar
JaCe
Alumni
Alumni
Posts: 1819
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 7:17 am
Location: Sydney, AU

Postby JaCe » Fri Jul 03, 2009 6:24 pm

Been doin alot of night driving lately and I got down to 10.0L/100km for the same journey as the previous one. I'm pretty proud of myself here :)

Image

User avatar
arutha
Lancer Ralliart
Lancer Ralliart
Posts: 649
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:26 pm
Location: Brisvegas

Postby arutha » Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:44 pm

i find those number rather odd mate. driving mine around in city traffic the highest it gets is 12.7/100km. when i use to drive up to my ex's place on the bruce highway i use to get between 4-6/100km. i spose the mods i have done could cause the fuel consumption to drop slightly but it wouldn't explain the huge difference between what you and i are getting.
Born at JustJDM's 'ninjaworks' facility,
Honed into a weapon by Mercury Motorsport
Image

User avatar
JaCe
Alumni
Alumni
Posts: 1819
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 7:17 am
Location: Sydney, AU

Postby JaCe » Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:09 am

arutha wrote:i find those number rather odd mate. driving mine around in city traffic the highest it gets is 12.7/100km. when i use to drive up to my ex's place on the bruce highway i use to get between 4-6/100km. i spose the mods i have done could cause the fuel consumption to drop slightly but it wouldn't explain the huge difference between what you and i are getting.


You get 4 to 6L per 100km in an Evo X MR???

The best I can get is low 10's but that being said, I live in an apartment which takes a while to drive in/out at very low speeds, and I also live in the CBD which means I spend a while in traffic before I get out to even normal urban roads with start/stop traffic. I found using cruise control helps considerably in getting the fuel consumption down because my throttle control (i.e. right foot) doesn't seem so efficient.

User avatar
Vmo91
INACTIVE Member Account
Posts: 102
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 12:22 pm
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA

Postby Vmo91 » Mon Jul 20, 2009 6:19 am

i get high way like 30 mpg, i dk what that translates in km

User avatar
arutha
Lancer Ralliart
Lancer Ralliart
Posts: 649
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:26 pm
Location: Brisvegas

Postby arutha » Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:03 pm

i agree cruise control does a considerably better job at fuel economy than my foot ever could. i also find that using the paddles to shift in city traffic works better than just plodding along in normal
Born at JustJDM's 'ninjaworks' facility,

Honed into a weapon by Mercury Motorsport

Image

User avatar
JaCe
Alumni
Alumni
Posts: 1819
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 7:17 am
Location: Sydney, AU

Postby JaCe » Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:04 am

^ really? Using sport? Super sport?

Best ever so far is 450km/tank and thats with cruise control. However I noted there is minimal variance between light foot driving and a bit of spirit (as long as not thrashing)... i.e. keeping it in its sweet spot rather than before the power rush.
Image



"A man who stands for nothing, falls for anything."

User avatar
arutha
Lancer Ralliart
Lancer Ralliart
Posts: 649
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:26 pm
Location: Brisvegas

Postby arutha » Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:33 pm

normally drive with mine in either sport or s-sport in traffice with traction control half off and just use the paddles. im convinced that driving without the traction control helps because the car relies more on the ayc for control and doesn't engage the brakes constantly.
Born at JustJDM's 'ninjaworks' facility,

Honed into a weapon by Mercury Motorsport

Image

User avatar
chris
Lancer ES/EX
Lancer ES/EX
Posts: 194
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 1:14 pm

Postby chris » Wed Jul 22, 2009 2:03 pm

Best 9.4l/100 out of the ralliart but it`s only done 250k`s so far

User avatar
spareparts
Lancer Ralliart
Lancer Ralliart
Posts: 662
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:36 pm
Location: Mt Druitt, NSW, Australia

Postby spareparts » Wed Jul 22, 2009 5:56 pm

i got mine down to 9.8L/ 100 kms today
the voices may not be real, but they have some pretty good ideas :D:D
Image
..... If streets could talk they would Beg For Mercy!!! 151.6kw & 330nm @ all 4 paws .....

User avatar
spareparts
Lancer Ralliart
Lancer Ralliart
Posts: 662
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:36 pm
Location: Mt Druitt, NSW, Australia

Postby spareparts » Wed Jul 22, 2009 6:00 pm

Vmo91 wrote:i get high way like 30 mpg, i dk what that translates in km


1 mile to 1.6 ks give or take and i galon is about 4L's...
the voices may not be real, but they have some pretty good ideas :D:D

Image

..... If streets could talk they would Beg For Mercy!!! 151.6kw & 330nm @ all 4 paws .....

whitlam
Lancer ES/EX
Lancer ES/EX
Posts: 122
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:23 pm
Location: Northern Sydney, NSW, Australia

Postby whitlam » Wed Jul 22, 2009 6:37 pm

spareparts wrote:
Vmo91 wrote:i get high way like 30 mpg, i dk what that translates in km


1 mile to 1.6 ks give or take and 1 galon is about 4L's...


30 mpg = 7.8 L/100km

User avatar
chris
Lancer ES/EX
Lancer ES/EX
Posts: 194
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 1:14 pm

Postby chris » Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:59 pm

30mpg [imp gallon] = 9.3lt/100 7.6lt/100 = 36.8mpg these are imp gallons not US, as used in australia in the old days.
Imp gallon = approx 4.5lts
US gallon = approx 4lts


Return to “Evolution X Performance”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests