Nominations for the 2012 CCJ committee - ** CLOSED **
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 2:16 am
Intro
Now that the vote for the constitutional ammendments has closed and the results are in we have a clear picture of our committee structure moving forward and can move the next stage of the election process and that is a 7 day period for nominations.
There has been a slight change in the initial proposal, as part of committee discussions;
Members will be allowed to make 1 SELF nomination AND also be able to accept 1 PEER nomination of the positions their peers have nominated them for.
Self nomination is OPTIONAL, but once you have self nominated you cannot withdraw/change your nomination once the nomination period has closed.
For peer nominations, acceptance is OPTIONAL. Nominees will be unaware of how many people and who nominated them for each position, until it is revealed when the elections are opened.
The process in brief
7 day nomination period - all SELF and PEER nominations must occur in this timeframe.
3-4 days to compile nominations, notify nominees and have a committment, 72 hrs of this will be for nominees to consider which nomination(s) they wish to accept and time to configure the votes on SurveyMonkey.
7 days for the elections to be run.
Results announced.
Positions being filled are conditional on passing relevant checks.
*All members (Premium and non-premium) will be able to participate in the nominations cycle ONLY. Voting will still be restricted to PREMIUM ONLY.
To nominate someone please click on this link
http://clubcj.net/posting.php?mode=newtopic&f=101
During the 7 day nomination period - the nominations will be kept private, with the exception for myself and Mizta B, no one will be able to see any of the posts in the "Nominations 2012" sub-forum whilst the nominations process is in flight.
The main driver for this policy is;
* to get around member apathy - if you can't see if your preferred choice has been already nominated, would you risk not making an effort to ensure they were nominated?;
* encourage members to nominate a candidate that's different to what's already been put forward - gives a bit varierty to the electoral race - if people see the incumbent or a popular candidate being nominated, members may be less inclined to put their suggestion forward;
At the conclusion of the nominations period, all nominees will be approached via PM and advised of what positions they have been nominated for. They will have 72 hours to decide if and which of the nomination(s) they wish to accept prior to going to elections.
Once all the nominees have responded within the 72 hrs, accepted and committed to running in the elections, the "Nominations 2012" sub-forum will be released for public view but all threads locked to prevent editing.
The nominees once accepting a nomination or self-nominating cannot pull out of the election. No further nominations will be accepted unless there were no nominations for a position to start off with with no pre-existing elected individual holding that position.
At the same time the "Candidate Showcase" sub-forum will be opened with a thread for each nominee. It will allow each nominee to make their pitch to the members, why they should be elected and I hope outline what plans they have for the club and members. Members can also ask their questions. This will be opened prior to elections and remain open during the elections.
Why the "blind" nomination process?
Simple. I do not want fresh talent some how feeling intimidated by virtue that they only got 2 nominations over someone else's 10 nominations, or the situation where perhaps they feel like they are "stealing" a position over the incumbent who's been around longer and feel that the competitor is somehow more "deserving" of the position over them. No one is "entitled" to a position.
*It also encourages members to nominate individuals without being put off if they see a large number of nominations for an alternative nominee.
*It stops candidates from being scared off by whom they are competing against or bow out early because they think their competitor is going to be a "shoe in/deserves it/is better than them/etc"
Positions that are available
President
Treasurer
Chief Buyer
MLO
Administrator (Forum & Club) - to be a primarily a technical and adminstrative role
5 x State Representatives for;
NSW/ACT
VIC/TAS
QLD
SA/NT
WA
For details of the positions, please refer to draft constiution document http://clubcj.net/2011-ProposedDRAFTClu ... tution.pdf for the time being - until I author the final PDF later today. Being that all ammendments have been passed, it shouldn't be hard to follow or you can wait half a day until I push the final out.
Apologies for the clutter of this post, it's been a long day and I'm under pressure to get this out. I'll tidy this up later today.
Now that the vote for the constitutional ammendments has closed and the results are in we have a clear picture of our committee structure moving forward and can move the next stage of the election process and that is a 7 day period for nominations.
There has been a slight change in the initial proposal, as part of committee discussions;
Members will be allowed to make 1 SELF nomination AND also be able to accept 1 PEER nomination of the positions their peers have nominated them for.
Self nomination is OPTIONAL, but once you have self nominated you cannot withdraw/change your nomination once the nomination period has closed.
For peer nominations, acceptance is OPTIONAL. Nominees will be unaware of how many people and who nominated them for each position, until it is revealed when the elections are opened.
The process in brief
7 day nomination period - all SELF and PEER nominations must occur in this timeframe.
3-4 days to compile nominations, notify nominees and have a committment, 72 hrs of this will be for nominees to consider which nomination(s) they wish to accept and time to configure the votes on SurveyMonkey.
7 days for the elections to be run.
Results announced.
Positions being filled are conditional on passing relevant checks.
*All members (Premium and non-premium) will be able to participate in the nominations cycle ONLY. Voting will still be restricted to PREMIUM ONLY.
To nominate someone please click on this link
http://clubcj.net/posting.php?mode=newtopic&f=101
During the 7 day nomination period - the nominations will be kept private, with the exception for myself and Mizta B, no one will be able to see any of the posts in the "Nominations 2012" sub-forum whilst the nominations process is in flight.
The main driver for this policy is;
* to get around member apathy - if you can't see if your preferred choice has been already nominated, would you risk not making an effort to ensure they were nominated?;
* encourage members to nominate a candidate that's different to what's already been put forward - gives a bit varierty to the electoral race - if people see the incumbent or a popular candidate being nominated, members may be less inclined to put their suggestion forward;
At the conclusion of the nominations period, all nominees will be approached via PM and advised of what positions they have been nominated for. They will have 72 hours to decide if and which of the nomination(s) they wish to accept prior to going to elections.
Once all the nominees have responded within the 72 hrs, accepted and committed to running in the elections, the "Nominations 2012" sub-forum will be released for public view but all threads locked to prevent editing.
The nominees once accepting a nomination or self-nominating cannot pull out of the election. No further nominations will be accepted unless there were no nominations for a position to start off with with no pre-existing elected individual holding that position.
At the same time the "Candidate Showcase" sub-forum will be opened with a thread for each nominee. It will allow each nominee to make their pitch to the members, why they should be elected and I hope outline what plans they have for the club and members. Members can also ask their questions. This will be opened prior to elections and remain open during the elections.
Why the "blind" nomination process?
Simple. I do not want fresh talent some how feeling intimidated by virtue that they only got 2 nominations over someone else's 10 nominations, or the situation where perhaps they feel like they are "stealing" a position over the incumbent who's been around longer and feel that the competitor is somehow more "deserving" of the position over them. No one is "entitled" to a position.
*It also encourages members to nominate individuals without being put off if they see a large number of nominations for an alternative nominee.
*It stops candidates from being scared off by whom they are competing against or bow out early because they think their competitor is going to be a "shoe in/deserves it/is better than them/etc"
Positions that are available
President
Treasurer
Chief Buyer
MLO
Administrator (Forum & Club) - to be a primarily a technical and adminstrative role
5 x State Representatives for;
NSW/ACT
VIC/TAS
QLD
SA/NT
WA
For details of the positions, please refer to draft constiution document http://clubcj.net/2011-ProposedDRAFTClu ... tution.pdf for the time being - until I author the final PDF later today. Being that all ammendments have been passed, it shouldn't be hard to follow or you can wait half a day until I push the final out.
Apologies for the clutter of this post, it's been a long day and I'm under pressure to get this out. I'll tidy this up later today.