Hey all
I'm just curious, if say car A doesn't have insurance but car B does and B causes A to write off his car. Would A be able to claim from B since he doesn't have insurance?
***** ALERT - Nominations for your new ClubCJ Committee can be made here *****
Just curious
Moderators: Moderators, Senior Moderators
- The X
- INACTIVE Member Account
- Posts: 6769
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:41 am
- Location: Pyrmonia! Inner Sydney.
- Contact:
At the at fault driver pays up (or a least their insurance does).
So car B is at fault in this case, then car B's insurance would have to pay for repairs on both car A & B.
The only problem with car A is there is no insurance company to do the chasing up on your behalf, so as the driver of car A, you'll have to be dealing with Car B's insurance company directly or at least via Driver B.
I'm hoping you're talking about comprehensive insurance and not the compulsory third party that's a requirement of registration.
So car B is at fault in this case, then car B's insurance would have to pay for repairs on both car A & B.
The only problem with car A is there is no insurance company to do the chasing up on your behalf, so as the driver of car A, you'll have to be dealing with Car B's insurance company directly or at least via Driver B.
I'm hoping you're talking about comprehensive insurance and not the compulsory third party that's a requirement of registration.
- shadow-vex
- Lancer Evolution
- Posts: 873
- Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 6:29 pm
- Location: camden
As I understand it, when you make a not at fault claim, your insurer pays you directly from their pot, you don't get paid from the at fault driver's insurance. They either just add it to the ledger and all the underwriters settle their IOUs at the end of the year, or they get the funding a long time down the track once they sort it out.
As Pete mentioned, if the not at fault driver is uninsured, you won't have them acting as your agent to do all the chasing up, but that could also mean it takes months (or years) for you to get the money, as you won't be paid up front from your insurer, you will need to wait for the at fault insurer to come good. And to be honest, regardless of how straightforward the accident is, I wouldn't ever bank on seeing that money if its just little old you up against an insurance company. The insurers can be fighting about who is paying for a long time after cars have been repaired and the customers are on their happy way.
As Pete mentioned, if the not at fault driver is uninsured, you won't have them acting as your agent to do all the chasing up, but that could also mean it takes months (or years) for you to get the money, as you won't be paid up front from your insurer, you will need to wait for the at fault insurer to come good. And to be honest, regardless of how straightforward the accident is, I wouldn't ever bank on seeing that money if its just little old you up against an insurance company. The insurers can be fighting about who is paying for a long time after cars have been repaired and the customers are on their happy way.
- jordan.fuchs
- Lancer Ralliart
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 1:00 pm
- jordan.fuchs
- Lancer Ralliart
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 1:00 pm
Unfortunately no, I kinda wish it did, as there are a lot of cars around that don't have insurance, so if you get hit by them, you have to cover all the excess charges from insurance that you shouldn't have to.
I think NZ has a law that requires at least some insurance to cover against damage to other cars, we need something along those lines in Australia I recon.
I think NZ has a law that requires at least some insurance to cover against damage to other cars, we need something along those lines in Australia I recon.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests